day 8: Jim Campbell

Posted by LB. on 28th September 2009 in Art, Music

IAWizardOfOz
Illuminated Average #5
Lightbox with Duratrans print, 24″ x 18″

Over the past twenty years, Jim Campbell has played with, digressed from, re-incorporated, and made his name with interactive installation.

As the definition of art is subjective in this modern day and age, and that the meaning of the term artist has so drastically changed over the past century, today many people would agree with the fact that art can be virtually anything. This is why I wish to first give my own definition of an artist to properly and accurately describe Jim Campbell’s work within my own views, and to further help describe all artists of which I shall talk about in the future. An artist is more than a creator, he or she is someone who can suggest symbolism or meaning within their work, who demonstrate skill in technique and agility with materials, and most of all, someone who can make something visually rich and stimulating for the eye, and aesthetically appealing – that perhaps suggests something aesthetic that the untrained mind may not comprehend, yet that one still feels is beautiful beneath the surface.

Based on this definition, I would prefer to call Jim Campbell an electronic and technical mastermind rather than an artist. This is in no way or form to discredit the man or his work, but people are not automatically artists just because they have come up with new techniques or ideas that push this world further. Mr. Campbell has been labelled something that he is not. It’s the same as if someone would have called an electrician a computer technician.

Indeed, he is, in my opinion, an innovator in terms of technique. Indeed, the works that he produces aren’t always  aesthetically or visually interesting or pleasing, but overall they always present something technologically new and pertinent. What Mr. Campbell has come up with are techniques that can be used as new mediums that artists can use to express themselves.

It’s fine to expose your work in a gallery or museum, but let them be more specific to the practice. Just because something is new, or different, or because it has a meaning that is well depicted, does not make it art, and does not mean that it should be exposed in an art gallery. Perhaps there should be technological advancements in terms of technique galleries, if you catch my drift.

The first picture is a frame by frame superimposition of the entire Fleming’s The Wizard Of Oz movie. The picture is visually stimulating, but this is only credible to the Mr. Campbell to the extent that he put it together. The real art here is the movie itself, and the technical aspect is what can be produced by superimposing its frames one over the other. Ultimately, anyone could have done this, but he thought of it first.

 

Library, 2004
L.E.D. continuous-motion image with attached Plexiglas and photogravure, 26-1/4″ x 31-1/2″ x 3″, Edition of 6
Here we find a piece that is somewhat visually interesting in terms of composition and lighting, but what is fascinating about it is the way in which Mr. Campbell has managed to create movement within a still image by juxtaposing two mediums. When he talked about it during a conference he had in Montreal, there was no mention of meaning, but personally I see it as souls making their way around the world.

LEChurch1
Church On Fifth Avenue, 2001
Custom electronics  

A sheet of diffusing Plexiglas is angled in front of a low-res video shown as a light composed grid. Basically this demonstrates the transformation between a digital representation (pixelated light grid) to an analog one (a blurry, but slightly clearer image). Mr. Campbell suggests through his work that there is no such thing as a digital image, but rather digital representations and analog representations. An image is something tangible, and in this, he is right. But this is no more than a suggestion, a proposition. Again, the images are from a video that was shot at random, without a  controlled environment . Fleeting art can be credible and interesting, but in this case, the video was used because of its practical subject matter (people walking back and forth) in order to demonstrate the difference between analog and digital representation.

INHeisenberg1
Untitled (For Heisenberg), 1994-95
Eight ultrasonic sensors, salt, laser disc player, computer, custom electronics
In this installation, the closer the viewer went towards the image of the two lovers, the more the image zoomed into the part of the body they were approaching. The image’s symbolic is one of voyeurism and of the Heinsenberg theory, in which he states that when one tries to see an object from a closer angle, one looses the sense of the object itself. In this project he developed techniques using sensors to detect movement in relation to the display. This is not the only way that he has found to play with this concept using interactive techniques. He’s also displayed a Buddha in a box which got foggier the closer that you got to it.
  

I apologize to Mr. Campbell, for I feel as though I have disgraced him in some way by taking away the term artist. But it could have been any other person who was making anything else than art that may have been the subject of this article. May there be no confusion, I chose to write about him because I believe that what he has to offer is very interesting. However, in the end, using imagery and light to depict a message, or to demonstrate a technical aspect of presentation, does not make one an artist. In my opinion, what Mr. Campbell has to offer and is technically based, rather than artistically based.

 

To digress from artsy-fartsy stuff in order to end this article on a musical note, I’d like to suggest some jazz music. Whether you are getting ready for school, exhausted from a long day’s work, or just taking it easy on a Saturday morning, John Coltrane is your man. Here are some of his best pieces:

 

In A Sentimental Mood

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

 

Too Young To Go Steady

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

It’s So Easy To Remember (But So Hard To Forget)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

I Wish I Knew

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

 

He’s the type of guy that you’d see walking down the street, and you’d think to yourself ”Now that’s a smart man, he must be a scientist or a teacher”. Although, you wouldn’t mistake him for an artist either, walking into one of his conferences where all seats are taken. The thing is, even though he looks like an artist, the meaning of the term has so drastically changed over the past century, that I’m not quite sure that that’s what I would call him. He is, in my opinion, an innovator in terms of artistic technique, but the peices that he produces aren’t always esthetically or visually pleasing or beautiful. Although, make no mistake, this term has become subjective, since the beggining of the 21st century, being that almost everyone can be an ”artist”. In a way, it’s sad that impressionistic and expressionist paintings are dissapearing. Not to discredit Mr. Campbell, but this is not my favorite type of art. However, I have chosen to write about him because, despite the lack of asthetic interest in his work, what he has to offer goes far beyond what many artists can these days. This is not ”I’m making something weird, and therefore I am an artist” art. This is technological art. In this, I wouldn’t consider him so much as an artist, but rather as a technical innovator, who has many interesting mediums and methods to suggest to the world, all of which can be practically used in the arts. A bit before, and in the early 1990’s, impressionists, fauvists, expressionists were making beautiful, esthetic, visually pleasing paintings.  

Over the past twenty years, Jim Campbell has played with interactive installation, digressed from it, re-incorporated it, and then made it his very own expression. He is a master of light

5 Responses to “day 8: Jim Campbell”

  1. Elvis Lastiri Says:

    I know this is really boring and you are skipping to the next comment, but I just wanted to throw you a big thanks – you cleared up some things for me!

  2. Matthew C. Kriner Says:

    I am really enjoying reading your well written articles. It looks like you spend a lot of effort and time on your blog. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!

  3. ELC Says:

    This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work.

  4. Dorotha Hagwell Says:

    You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.

  5. Chiriqui, Panama Says:

    You can tally me in for a Digg. Thanks for posting this on your web site!

Leave a Reply